The Angriest and Loudest Get All the Attention

Up until recently I’d never heard the name Jussie Smollett.  Nor have I heard much about a TV show called “Empire.”  (I rarely watch TV)

But when I first heard about his alleged mugging by white Trump supporters wearing MAGA hats, it raised a couple of simple questions.

1. Who in their right mind would be out at 2:30 a.m. in -25 below zero weather looking to mug some black guy?
2.  If you’re going out in -25 below zero weather, wouldn’t you, at least wear a warmer hat?

Now, I don’t like to pick on certain politicians (well…maybe a little…kinda…sorta) but I find it interesting how Nancy Pelosi quietly deleted her tweet slamming the RACIST HOMOPHOBIC ATTACK on Jussie Smollett.   

Pelosi is just one snowflake in an avalanche of liberals who accepted Smollett’s bizarre story without so much as questioning the logic behind two Trump supporters out at 2 a.m. in -25-degree temps in a wealthy Chicago enclave.

Supposedly, they not only recognized Smollett – but knew he was gay, and they just happened to be carrying a bleach-like substance and a noose. 

Of course, the media presstitutes threw gallons of gasoline on this from the start.

That got me thinking…what’s the motive?

Warning!

You’re gonna need your tin foil hat to follow me on this.

Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris and Corey Booker brought out an anti-lynching bill just coincidentally timed ahead of the attack.

This kind of event would ensure passage as the momentum built from public outrage (until the attack was exposed as phony).  

Smollett, the gay, black, supposed victim, had everyone slobbering sympathy on him. 

It was an angry, loud, screaming political set-up that failed.

If it was true, who could refuse to vote for the Harris/Booker anti-lynching bill?  

Are you starting to see how 2019, The Political Year From Hell is taking shape? Learn how to stay ahead of the curve on this (HERE).