Openly Admitting Censorship

It was not that long ago when Hillary openly admitted censorship is good…for them.

 

And, not surprisingly, she is at it again.

 

Cue up: Hillary’s recent interview where she warns… that allowing free speech on social media means “we lose control.”

 

Question:  Lose control of what?

 

Openly admitting that censorship gives them control is the typical perverse mindset of the control freaks currently in power.

 

And it doesn’t stop there.

 

They – starting with Hillary – have long since ridiculed and openly mocked us…in addition to their own supporters.

 

From 2005…

 

 

 

 

BTW, the above statement is one time where many of us could agree with the Hilda-Beast.

 

But is it just us or does anyone else think that people, or certain organizations openly admitting to censorship, are in complete violation of the 1^st Amendment?

 

And if that is the case, what is the punishment?

 

 

Openly Admitting Censorship 

 

 

In Case You Missed it, Hillary is not alone.

 

Cue up:  Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

 

Just over one month ago, Zuck admitted to Joe Rogan that the FBI pressured Facebook into censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.

 

And it didn’t stop there.

 

Zuckerberg further admitted that senior Biden administration officials “repeatedly pressured” Facebook teams to suppress information related to COVID-19 that the platform would not have otherwise censored.

And in a half-baked apology Zuck said that Facebook should not have compromised its standards “due to pressure from any Administration in either direction.”

 

“I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” reads the letter. “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.”

 

 

Ironically (or NOT) people like Zuckerberg and Hillary are beyond reproach and somehow continue to operate “above the law.”

 

Maybe it’s because of who they are connected with.

 

 

 

 

Meanwhile, Kamalama (aka: Obama in a skirt and/or Hillary on steroids) is boasting about sending more money to people suffering in North Carolina…

 

Just kidding…she was talking about Lebanon.

 

 

 

 

Question:  Do you think Kamalama’s handlers would post this if they were worried about not winning the election?

Bottom line here?

 

The distractions will continue to escalate to keep the average American from seeing what is going on behind the curtain.

And in the process, many investors will suffer as volatility in the markets heats up before November.

 

So, don’t be surprised when events that rock the markets are met with cries of “I’m shocked I tell you…Shocked! Who could have foreseen this happening?”

 

Don’t be surprised by what’s going to happen by reading our “…In Plain English” newsletter (HERE).

(It could save you a fortune).

 

Share this with a friend.  Especially if they think Kamalama is worse than Hillary.  They’ll thank YOU later.

 

And tell them:

 

We’re Not Just About Finance

But we use finance to give you hope.

Support always welcome via the digital tip jar.

 

*****************************************